Bucking the trend
Until the voters prove me wrong at the polls, I’m optimistic about our chances on Tuesday – not just locally but statewide and nationally too. But yesterday I read a pundit who declared that the GOP is giving up on retaining the U.S. Senate seats in Pennsylvania (Santorum) and Ohio (DeWine) to concentrate on other states where candidates once thought reasonably safe were in trouble. And this was from a nominally conservative author.
I lived in Ohio the last time Senator DeWine was on the ballot in 2000. His reelection that year was considered such a lock that I voted for the Libertarian candidate to try and keep that party on the ballot. Six years later, a combination of a President made unpopular by a constantly carping mainstream media and a scandal called “Coingate” (dug up by my hometown paper) that has tarred the Ohio GOP is resulting in DeWine trailing a liberal Congressman named Sherrod Brown in the polls. Tuesday could well mark the beginning of the end of Mike DeWine’s Senate career and place an Ohio Democrat in the U.S. Senate for the first time since 1998. Or will it? No matter what is said and written about any race, the end result isn’t known until the final ballots are counted. I’ve seen polling margins of as much as 17 points disappear in the final 10 days of a campaign.
But the DeWine situation continues a disagreement I’ve had with the Ohio GOP and to a lesser extent the Maryland state party. It seems to me they listen too much to the so-called “conventional wisdom” and pay too little attention to the actual voters. Mike DeWine is only thrown out of the Senate if the state and national GOP sends the message they’ve given up on him and the voters respond to it.
There were polls in the Maryland media this week showing that the GOP candidates for Attorney General (Scott Rolle) and Comptroller (Anne McCarthy) both trail their Democrat opponents by double-digit margins. But that can all be erased if people who support their campaigns get out to the polls with 100% efficiency. Besides, there’s a pretty good chance that the poll may have been slanted or flawed (consider the source) by its base of responders and the timing of it. After all, how much media in this state worries about what the Eastern Shore thinks?
To me each Election Day I work a poll at is like a Super Bowl – a culmination of a long campaign season. In the 2000 election campaign I was out doing nominating petitions in the dead of an Ohio winter for a State House candidate because the filing deadline was early January for the March primary. (I actually did my personal nominating petition for the county’s central committee in the summer of 1999 for a March 2000 election.) That year turned out to be a full-year process that almost literally started the day after the 1999 municipal elections concluded, so really there wasn’t much of a break between the summer of 1999 and Election Day of 2000.
But I don’t give up on a candidate nor do I give up on races. If we do happen to lose the elections this year, it will hopefully teach us lessons on how we can both educate and motivate the electorate. Unlike the Democrats, who whined after the last three election cycles that “they didn’t get their message out” while desperately trying to obfuscate what they REALLY stood for (bigger, more intrusive government), most of the disappointment with the Republicans is that they have strayed away from their principles. It’s almost a case of trying to out-liberal the Democrats and as the country gets more conservative they’re chasing an ever-shrinking pie of left-wing voters. And part of this is because they know that right-wingers really don’t have a place to go aside from staying home on Election Day.
But rather than throw my hands up in disgust and give up on these politicians, they’re still getting my vote as they should yours. It’s purely logical to think that, if someone feels the same way about 80% of the issues as you do, it’s going to be a lot easier to debate with them about the last 20% of the way and press to get that little extra than it is to start over with a person who only believes in 20% of what you do but talks a good game. Put another way, in 1994 the GOP gained control of Capitol Hill based on the principles encoded in the “Contract With America.” It’s far less likely that if the Democrats regain the majority in Congress (or more locally, take back the governor’s seat) that principles and issues Americans endorsed in 1994 and still believe in today will be advanced.
People may argue that, “well, the Democrats will only be in power for one term and then the GOP will learn its lesson and return in 2008/2010.” I’m sure that the Republicans felt that way after the 1954 Congressional elections as well, figuring a 1956 return was inevitable. But it took the GOP 40 long years to get Congress back and a lot of what conservatives target as “big government programs” were enacted during that four decade period. At 42 years of age, I personally don’t want to grow old waiting for another Congress to advance the principles of conservatism, particularly in the judiciary where we’re just one vacancy away from placing the Supreme Court back into truly Constitutional hands.
If it does come to pass that the Democrats seize back Congress (unfortunately we can’t ask the late Peter Jennings if that event would qualify as a “national temper tantrum” too) and the O’Malley/Cardin team of expansive and intrusive government takes over control of our state, conservatives who stayed home and didn’t vote will certainly be kicking themselves. Worse, it will become a feeding frenzy for the “drive-by media” as the “blue tsunami” angle will certainly be played up. The answer for some elected Republicans, unfortunately, will be to go even more moderate in the hopes of playing to where they percieve the electorate to be and the principles of conservatism will be set back even further.
You know, sometimes I wish the Democrats who get their panties in a bunch about the so-called “domestic spying” program and “eroding civil liberties” would sit down and think (yes I know this can be tough for them at times) about things like private property rights, Massachusetts-style health insurance laws, business licensing, and unfunded mandates – a million and one government regulations and restrictions that place more curbs on our personal freedom than a measure enacted in a time of war and designed to affect only a small portion of Americans who wish to damage our nation by encouraging foes from without. With as much talk as liberals have about wanting to be free from religion in schools and public places, they should be the first to support our war against the Islamofascists since I doubt they have the desire to be converted to Islam at the point of a gun either. Our enemies have no problem with dying for their cause if they take a few “infidels” with them, and they’re more than willing to sacrifice generations until they win their battle to subdue the West and make America their own caliphate.
Twice as a high schooler, I wrote and delivered a prizewinning presentation for the VFW Voice of Democracy contest. One of them had the subject of “My Commitment To My Country” and while I’ve long since misplaced the speech I wrote I’ve maintained the commitment.
A freedom fighter can be described as someone who’s brave and dedicated enough to protect our country, even at the cost of his or her life, in our armed forces. I declined to do that, as I had the fortune of going through draft age in a period where there was none, the 1980′s. But I prefer to think that I do my best freedom fighting and serve out my commitment with the words I write. Aside from that talent, I’m an ordinary citizen who works, pays his taxes, volunteers here and there, and tries to be a net contributor in life rather than a net taker. And I think most Americans are like me in that respect.
So while the state and national Republicans might not like the chances of some candidates, it’s up to the voters to decide. And if they believe as I do that the government that governs best governs least then they’ll touch the screen or punch their ballot for Republican candidates. Then they and I will work on achieving that last 20% of agreement rather than attempting to climb that mountain of an 80% disagreement.
Clarifications
When I wrote it, I knew what I meant…
“As I’ve stated, I’ve done local newsletters before to keep people in my precinct informed about Central Committee happenings and will do more of that after I’m sworn in. Fortunately monoblogue can cover all of Wicomico County, no more hand delivery! I found out on Thursday night that I’ll officially be sworn in during the fall Maryland Republican Party convention in Annapolis on December 2nd.”
However, after the Central Committee meeting on Monday, there were a couple people (who shall remain nameless) that pointed out a couple comments I’d made here and it placed me on the defensive. But if you are a regular reader of monoblogue, you’ll notice that I will post monthly on Republican Club meetings but I do not post on Central Committee meetings. This is intentional because there’s sensitive discussions that happen there at times which have to do with overall GOP campaign strategy and I’d like to keep that stuff close to my vest.
On the other hand, WCRC meetings have a much more public face. It was stated to me by these same people that they thought it would be better to have people pay for their membership if they want to find out what’s happening with the WCRC. But I disagree because I believe my efforts would encourage membership in the long run. Yes, I give what most people who were there tell me is a very faithful rehashing of the events and speakers that grace our meetings, but the only way to enjoy the fellowship and meet the speakers is to actually attend the meetings – then sooner or later the membership dues will come in. If no one hears about the meetings, you’re not going to get a lot of people showing up. I realize this is an election year, but could it be possible that the coverage I give on monoblogue may have convinced a few extra bodies to make the effort to attend these meetings, and just possibly chip in a couple more dollars to the kitty?
I thought the best way to explain my philosophy was to use examples from my past so I went and dug out the newsletters I did during the two years of my elected term to the Lucas County Republican Central Committee (1998 to 2000). On an occasional basis, I would write up and distribute a two or four page newsletter to anywhere from 50 to 80 people in my precinct – in total I did eight editions of the newsletter I called the 16-P Leader (named for my 16th Ward and Precinct P).
This is one example of my Central Committee reporting, from the very first edition in 1998:
Talmage, Griswold picked by GOP
On June 13, at a sometimes acrimonious reorganization meeting, Dee Talmage and Mike Griswold were elected to run the Lucas County Republican Party Executive Committee and Central Committee, respectively.
Mrs. Talmage will now replace James Brennan at the helm of the local party and take over the daily operations. She was selected by a unanimous vote of the Central Committee, after interviewing with a selection committee made up of local GOP leaders. The selection committee selected her over Sylvania Township trustee Dock Treece and Senate District 2 State Central Committeman Paul Hoag.
At the same meeting, Mike Griswold was selected to head up the party’s Central Committee (the body you elected me to) by a 145 to 77 margin over 21st Ward Chair Susan Abood. Our 16th Ward went 12 to 1 in favor of Mr. Griswold, myself being the lone Abood holdout (I seconded her nomination as well). I felt that Mrs. Abood would help steer the party in a new direction away from the “old guard”.
Speaking of the 16th Ward, we elected a new ward chair in the person of Tim Kuhlman, who replaces William Outland. Mr. Outland was defeated in his precinct reelection bid.
Also of note: on May 5th, we elected Chuck Larkins to represent the 11th Senate District Republicans on the State Central Committee, replacing longtime incumbent James Brennan. Donna Owens was unopposed for her seat.
I also had articles in this newsletter introducing myself to the voters, our precinct’s results from the previous fall’s local election, a candidate focus on the Republican who was running for State Senate from our district, a short note about the state income tax deductability of political contributions, an appeal for volunteers, and fundraiser news for GOP candidates. Honestly, I should take some time and scan all these newsletters as background files because in rereading them last night, I could tell that people would see the obvious seeds of monoblogue being planted in these newsletters.
What’s most important to note is that the Executive Committee of the LCRP has much the same function as the Wicomico County Central Committee does. It’s a much smaller body made up of ward chairs and they make the decisions about candidate endorsement and appointment. The Central Committee people (also called precinct chairs) ratify the decisions made by the Executive Committee and work their respective precincts to increase GOP turnout and registration (which was my task and one thing I managed to accomplish in my 2 year term). My newsletter was one effort in trying to get people more politically involved – in later editions I added items on neighborhood issues such as the local Block Watch and a grassroots effort to redistrict City Council.
This website is an extension of the purpose behind my precinct newsletter, with monoblogue I can update on all the issues I care about and I can do it a lot more frequently. My goal on being elected to the Wicomico County version of the Republican Central Commitee (as stated before) is to make the Republican Party the majority party in Wicomico County and involve more people, particularly young adults, in the political process. Since more and more people get news from the internet, this is the perfect place for giving out the facts about the Wicomico County GOP and enhancing it with my “wonkish” conservative commentary.
The time for cynicism is over. I share many of the same goals as the rest of the Central Committee – getting good Republican candidates and helping them win their elections at all levels. Because one particular GOP candidate has a problem with certain “cancerous” local blogs, it’s no reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater. The Wicomico County GOP didn’t have too many problems with the blogs prior to September 13 and the party will have to deal with them, like it or not, after November 7. I’m hoping the WCRCC can work with and learn from the conservative side of the local blog world, the possiblility of being an outstanding amplifier of our message is there if we learn how to work with those involved.
Eastern Shore Political Buzz Examiner
Syndicate
Subscribe to this site's RSS feed.
-
-
-
Advertise with monoblogue and you’ll reach a lot of people!
Click on the photo for details.
Link to Maryland Democratic Party
In the interest of being fair and balanced, I provide this service to readers. But before you click on the picture below, just remember their message:
Locals flock to monoblogue
Click on the photo for details on advertising opportunities.
Please note that the opinions expressed on monoblogue are not necessarily those of the Wicomico County Republican Party Central Committee, of which I'm a member. (But they probably should be.)
