New Delaware links

Apparently it was a hot time in Sussex County last night – and we thought the battle for Chair here in Maryland between the establishment and TEA Party was intense. But given the venom which still exists after the entire Christine O’Donnell and Mike Castle primary last September (five months ago!), I’m doubtful we here in Maryland have anything on the First State.

Obviously I’m looking at this as an outside observer, but thanks to Chris Slavens (who I already link to) I found a few other link-worthy sites across the Transpeninsular Line – check out DelawarePolitics.net and their extensive coverage along with Blue Hen Conservative and Sussex County Angel

In many ways, Delaware is the image of Maryland – a state dominated by an urban region where conservative rural residents are forgotten or just plain abused by the state government. They have a story worth telling as well, and while I don’t focus much on their state it’s worth linking to those in the know.

A new feature, and hopefully not a bug

Since it was 3 a.m. and I couldn’t sleep, I decided to do something a little useful.

You’ll notice (at the bottom of this and any other post) that I’ve now included the AddToAny sharing feature. If you like something I write, feel free to share with your friends. The idea is to build readership, and hopefully it will make my task easier since I generally pimp my posts on Facebook but don’t often remember to include Twitter – maybe the rest of ya’ll can do this. I had something similar when I did my Examiner pages so now it’s imported here.

I also came up with a new poll question; we’ll see how that flies among readership since it’s more controversial than most. Otherwise, look for part 2 of my Salisbury City Council questions tonight.

You may now carry on.

And the 2010 blog poll winner is…

New year, two of the same three competitors, same result – afterthegoldrush has been picked by my readers as the area’s best blog.

Unlike last year’s heated polling, which came down to a tight 6 vote margin between Ridgely’s site and Salisbury News, this one was a blowout from the start as afterthegoldrush dominated each of its contests – it won the opening round with 68.42% of the vote, dominated its semifinal with an astounding 88.89 percent, and eclipsed the 80 percent mark again in the final.

Here are the final results:

  • afterthegoldrush – 36 votes (80%)
  • Twirling, Twirling, Twirling Towards Freedom – 5 votes (11.11%)
  • Salisbury Soapbox – 4 votes (8.89%)

You can see the juggernaut in motion throughout the month or so I did this polling, which I’ll keep doing as a year-end tradition. I was a little disappointed in the dearth of votes for the semifinals and finals, which leads me to believe that perhaps I either milked the concept a little bit too long or made the repeat voting a little too restrictive. It’s something I’ll take into consideration as I do the 2011 version later this year.

So congratulations to Ridgely, who runs an interesting musically-based site. I hear he may branch out a bit into politics for the local elections but I count on him to stay true to his style.

As for the poll, it’s going to take a few days off but I have one in the works for later next week.

The finals are set…

It appears voters have eschewed the political for the local blogs featuring other subjects as the best local blog competition reaches the finals.

More surprisingly, each of the top three seeds are out as none of them gained a lot of traction in the semifinals – on the other hand, both repeating finalists from last year which survived the opening rounds made it through. The three winners which will be moving on are listed in bold from each semifinal, along with their original seeding.

Semifinal #1:

  1. #5 Salisbury Soapbox – 38 votes (57.58%)
  2. #1 Random Thoughts of a Citymouse – 21 votes (31.82%)
  3. #9 Delmar Dustpan – 7 votes (10.61%)

Semifinal #2:

  1. #4 afterthegoldrush – 112 votes (88.89%)
  2. #3 The Salisbury Grinch – 8 votes (6.35%)
  3. #8 Delmarva Sportsmen – 6 votes (4.76%)

Semifinal #3:

  1. #7 Twirling, Twirling, Twirling Towards Freedom – 51 votes (87.93%)
  2. #6 Delmarva Shorebirds Blog – 6 votes (10.34%)
  3. #2 Right Coast – 1 vote (1.72%)

The winners of the last two semifinals are the repeat finalists from last year, as afterthegoldrush will be defending its title against Twirling and newcomer Salisbury Soapbox.

I’ll go ahead and leave the poll up through Saturday, with the winner once again receiving a lovely package of bragging rights for the next year.

How the poll goes

As you can see over to the right of this article, my “best local blog” poll is taking a hiatus for the holidays, replaced by an RNC poll that I’ll leave up for a few days. But I found the opening round results of my local blog poll quite interesting.

Last year, I had three finalistsafterthegoldrush, Salisbury News, and Twirling, Twirling, Twirling Towards Freedom. Since I only had twelve competitors last year, the first round of four polls cut the field to six (4 winners + 2 wildcards), then the semifinals cut the remainder in half (the two winners + a wildcard.) afterthegoldrush was a wildcard in the first round that survived, won its semifinal, and defeated Salisbury News 152-146 in the final poll (4TF received six votes.)

But in 2010 I expanded the field to 24, and since I want to maintain 3-way races the eight round winners will be joined by just one wildcard into one of three semifinals, with the three winners moving on. From here on out, just like the NFL playoffs, it’s win or go home.

Of the three who were in the finals last year, two have survived into the semifinals. Here is the list in seeding order, based strictly on the number of votes with which each won its individual round.

  1. Random Thoughts of a Citymouse (191 votes)
  2. Right Coast (175 votes – wildcard)
  3. The Salisbury Grinch (93 votes)
  4. afterthegoldrush (65 votes)
  5. Salisbury Soapbox (56 votes)
  6. Delmarva Shorebirds Blog (40 votes)
  7. Twirling, Twirling, Twirling Towards Freedom (37 votes)
  8. Delmarva Sportsmen (17 votes)
  9. Delmar Dustpan (8 votes)

While many contenders garnered more than eight votes, they didn’t happen to be in such a weak first-round draw. That’s life. In the semifinals the rounds will be made as equal as possible.

This poll will return January 3rd with the first of three semifinals, with the winner being crowned later in January.

Response to an interested observer

Expanding her comment to my post about former MDGOP Chair hopeful Andrew Langer’s endorsement of Mary Kane, Right Coast blogger Julie Brewington almost laments about my “almost lament(ing)” the news.

While I know Julie has the best interests of conservatism in mind there are a couple items for which I need to take her to task. I suppose she can plead ignorance because there’s information I’m privy to as one inside the MDGOP as opposed to her outside position. Certainly I would be in a similar situation if the discussion came up about the local TEA Parties or the Wicomico County AFP circa late 2009.

Let’s begin with the Chambers Compact. Originally the brainchild of a group of Red Maryland editors led by Mark Newgent, it was revised and expanded by Langer. While I’ve had my disagreements with the remainder of the Red Maryland group in the past and had to set them straight a time or two, I think they have their hearts in the right place.

When you read the document it calls for, among other things, a leader “skilled at (grassroots) organization” and holding the “career politicians and statists” in Annapolis accountable. I see neither of these aspects in Mary Kane, not to mention that the party was already led once by her husband John, a hand-picked acolyte of then-Governor Bob Ehrlich. Talk about top-down leadership!

I also knew that Langer has been active in the MDGOP for some time, but applauded his efforts to reach out (or, as Julie seems to believe, co-opt) the TEA Party movement. Obviously since I happen to be on the Central Committee as is Julie’s former AFP cohort Joe Collins, we’re all trying to bring the two parties together. Simply put, we believe their political home should be the Republican Party! If that is Julie’s definition of co-opting, well, it is what it is.

But I’m also among those who also believe that many of those things the TEA Party stands for (things the GOP tended to drift away from over the last decade) should become part of the Republican platform. Not all “establishment” politicians are bad and some have decided to bring about change as they can within the system.

For these and other reasons, yes, I was surprised that Langer departed from his stated positions. I know he disgusted several of his potential supporters, including me – as I said, you could’ve knocked me over with a feather. Perhaps Julie’s seen that side of him but I thought he would be more of a man of his word.

As Andrew has, I’ve also spoken at some length to Mary Kane. We had a sometimes-spirited discussion but it wasn’t enough to convince me to give her my initial support. Simply put, I think there are at least two and possibly three others in the race who would do a better job. My observation is based on the past history of the Kane family being in charge of the party and things she has said in both the phone conversation and in writing.

So, yes, color me surprised. Obviously it makes sense that Jim Rutledge would endorse one of his former campaign workers for the post but this one came out of left field – I would have expected Andrew to go in another direction.

A half-decade of monoblogue

It’s the same bat-time, same bat-channel as I’ve done this retrospective the last couple years. And aside from the terrible twos when I was busy at a convention, each previous year I’ve done an anniversary post.

I use these retrospective posts sort of like a President uses the State of the Union address, except I don’t bring in a number of guests to pander to the viewing audience. Each year as time passes I assess what I’ve done for this enterprise, good and bad, and figure out just what I’d like to say about it. And obviously with each passing year I believe things get bigger and better – maybe not necessarily in audience numbers or influence (although both were pretty close to a peak this year) but in terms of self-satisfaction. There hasn’t been a year yet where I didn’t think I did a better job than the last, but I can always find room for improvement too.

It goes without saying that monoblogue had a different appearance this year than in the past. This time last year I was playing around with a new look and found a theme I liked – it was adopted earlier this year.

The reasons I wanted the new look were twofold: I had a legacy theme which precluded me from the usage of widgets, meaning I had to painstakingly fix the two sidebars to get the look I wanted with the information I wanted to share, and the change allowed me a more flexible base for advertising. (In case you’re wondering, the theme is called Black Lucas 1.2. I haven’t run across any other blogs which use it, so I like that uniqueness.) It also provided a cleaner look where the headlines popped out and weren’t buried in the overall text of the story.

Another big change was the number of truncated stories. Beginning in March I had an Examiner.com blog and gained a second one in May. At the moment they both lie in a semi-dormant state, simply because I found writing for Examiner wasn’t all that lucrative considering the time investment. I’ve also found their new interface and site backend to be most annoying and their advertising too obtrusive, even when I put the finishing touches on articles. Knowing a number of other Examiners I’ve noticed their output has decreased as well, since it seems to be a site which focuses more on lifestyle and celebrity than politics. But I’m not shutting the doors there quite yet, as there may be a call to resume on it once the General Assembly session rolls around.

A more successful endeavor was being hired by Pajamas Media to cover the 2010 election here in Maryland. I had to step up the quality of my writing and subject selection in order to be included – listen, when you’re competing with guys like Victor Davis Hanson for space you’d better have your ‘A’ game on. (Plus I was well-compensated.) I was thrilled about giving Chuck Cook and our other ‘Off-Shorebird’ friends some well-deserved national ridicule – the video I shot has over 1,200 views. (Even better, Andy Harris was elected despite their efforts.)

Speaking of the election, on the whole I was pleased I didn’t join the stampede toward attempting to be a video star. I’m a writer, and that’s how I choose to present myself. Putting an amateur in front of a camera rarely leads to a good result and that’s particularly true when he’s trying to overshadow the candidate and become the star of the show. You probably don’t know this but at one point I was approached by a candidate about doing a ‘Meet the Press’ style video featuring other local bloggers and I but nobody wanted to work with anyone else. It’s probably better this didn’t come off.

That was part of the reason I used the Right Coast videos, for Matt Trenka isn’t a blogger so it wasn’t about promoting his website as much as it was about informing the electorate.

And since practically all these videos had viewership in the low three-digit range, to be honest most candidates would have done better to go out and signwave or make phone calls during the time spent.

Perhaps the biggest disappointment for the year was not getting any traction as far as advertising goes; in fact I lost a longstanding advertiser (I had their text-based ads for nearly three years) because their business went south. I got some advertisers during the campaign season but this year I was determined to keep free advertising to a minimum.

To this end I have taken a few steps to see just what my audience is, and quite honestly I’m surprised by its reach. If you’d asked me beforehand I would have guessed about a 50-50 split between local and the rest of the state; it’s actually closer to 2-to-1 outstate. Salisbury makes up just over a quarter of my readership, and my Google Analytics readership map is freckled by dots all over the state’s center. (That is probably due to my Facebook marketing, since a whole lot of my friends live across the Bay Bridge.) 

So I can’t just cater to a local audience or advertisers – they have to think more regional in scope. Of course, I’m not turning away local advertisers and for some businesses (like restaurants and retailers) there’s nothing wrong with expanding the market area. I’d love to have wineries, breweries, or others who look for the tourist trade as advertising clients!

As you may know, I’m not a super-aggressive salesman (Hard$ell is a good band but it’s not my nature) because I prefer to just put out a good product and let it sell itself. But losing that text-ad client put me in the red for next year because they covered my server fee after about six months. In this case, I may have to do a little more to spread the word.

Last year I had an ambitious goal to increase my readership sevenfold by making my weekly readership numbers my daily ones. In truth, with being on Pajamas Media and other media outlets (let’s not forget my op-eds as well) there were days I achieved that – just not on this site.

Perhaps there’s only so much I can accomplish by keeping a local and state focus, but if I can make it a profitable enough venture I have a good base of operations from which to work on higher goals. Given the rapid amount of change in my life and this business over even the last year I really can’t say just what will come next around the corner. I’ve been fortunate enough to have opportunities presented to me and some are panning out even as I write this.

My chief goal over the next year as I begin another half-decade of this enterprise is to provide the utmost in quality while maintaining a reasonably decent quantity of work. I’m not going to be able to type out six good posts a day, but keeping my present pace of one to two (occasionally three) a day is doable with my other existing workload. I did my 2,000th post in mid-June, since then I’ve cranked out over 250 more.

So there you have it. Perhaps this is one of my wordier and more verbose posts but that’s how I write. As long as I continue to earn the respect of my peers and can advance in the writing profession life is good. And monoblogue has succeeded in that aspect beyond my wildest expectations.

A return

It’s a slow news day (unless and until a catfight breaks out among the crazier sleep-deprived Black Friday shoppers) so instead I’m going to post a heads-up for an upcoming event.

You may recall about this time last year I began a poll for the best local blog. Well, this year it returns with an expanded field of 24 contestants including defending 2009 champion afterthegoldrush, which edged out Salisbury News in the final poll.

Beginning Monday I’ll start the first of eight first-round polling battles, with the 8 winners and top runner-up in votes advancing to three semi-finals which will begin after Christmas (hey, it takes awhile to run eight polls.) And since it’s all in fun and I’m being as fair as I can, I excluded myself from the competition again.

Except for two that are not currently linked, the competitors can be found among those linked as Delaware and Eastern Shore blogs on the right sidebar (but not all of them – I tried to include those which regularly update and that I knew were from the lower Shore and slower lower Delaware.) Not all of them are political, but I excluded a couple personality-based blogs from the mix.

So let’s see what my local readers (which run about 1/3 of my audience) like among my local peers. Check back often to see who’s winning and help out your favorites!

Blogservations

To begin with, you may have noticed the survey I had on the sidebar. I wanted to have something of local interest to test a hypothesis I had…of course, then I latched onto a statewide story and didn’t let it go. So I actually ended up with fewer Salisbury readers than I had when I started (as a percentage, anyway.) So much for my theory!

Strangely enough, the survey was about two other local bloggers who focus on local issues and would presumably have a predominantly local readership. Well, I don’t know about their percentage of local readership but I know mine is pretty good – the plurality of my readers come from Salisbury, but they indeed come from all over Maryland. By the way, I was right in the fact that most people don’t like those two bloggers (if they even know who they are.) They’ve been known to be a touch on the vicious side and it rubs people the wrong way.

But I’ve noticed of late that the Delmarva Dealings site is no longer online. G.A. has taken a hiatus before but I don’t think his site actually went offline; I think he just didn’t post. So I don’t know if he’s just taking time off or washing his hands of the situation entirely. Maybe those two rub him the wrong way too.

Anyway, he does have a political perspective that’s being missed so hopefully he’ll be back soon.

Reprehensible

Radio edit: I’m tired of the he said/she said over the alcohol allegation because I have people I trust telling me both ways (in both e-mail and comments.) Had I known that would be an issue, I’d have skipped the mention because you can judge the video on its other merits, or lack thereof.

Not all of my readers have been with me for the duration of nearly five years I’ve done my site, but some may recall just how mad I was when a political candidate called bloggers a “cancer.” Two years later, that sentiment was repeated by Salisbury mayor Barrie Tilghman.

Every so often I have to be a (self-appointed) blog policeman and call out inappropriate behavior, and in a lot of cases it’s because of the same guy. I have pride in my craft and encourage others to be as responsible, but this rant takes the cake for vindictiveness and lack of character.

Okay, you don’t like the Brewingtons – we get it. Over the last three months or so it’s been an obsession of yours to try and wreck their campaigns (along with the local Americans for Prosperity chapter and anything else they’ve touched.) Yet the 2,486 votes they received are 2,486 more votes than any campaign of yours picked up, and I applaud them for at least stepping into the fray and attempting to make a difference. If you looked at what they actually stood for rather than the personalities, you may have found their platforms quite agreeable.

I didn’t call you Sideshow Bob on a previous post for nothing. Words mean things, and these words are a message for you.

I don’t know how many times you’ve claimed to be turning over a new leaf, but eventually the same old destructive tendencies come through. Is this really an example for a professional journalist to follow? (I use the word professional in the sense that you solicit for and have advertising on your site, not based on the quality of writing.)  If I were Bob Ehrlich or any other politician who has sat down with you I’d be embarassed to have spent time in treating you seriously once I saw this video. Maybe Andy Harris learned this lesson the hard way last time?

I’m not going to claim I ever went to “j-school” either but the one thing which has gotten me to the places I’ve made it to in this second career is integrity. It doesn’t seem like too many people back you in your stories anymore and in a case of your word against hers I’m not too sure I’d put a lot of money on your chances given some of the whoppers you’ve had to retract.

Let’s just put it this way: I’m glad I made the decision I did about three years ago to stay away from that mess. I feel no need to build myself up by tearing others down.

But I can understand why most of your contributors wish to go by assumed names. Maybe it’s time for them to consider washing their hands of the situation too.

I’m not going to be childish and suggest a boycott of advertisers, but they may want to ask themselves if that space is really worth it.

And to the readers: I find that I get better and more accurate news from other sources.

I’m certainly not the first to describe the site as a “train wreck” and there is an aspect of it which people have to see. But invariably train wrecks destroy lives and that’s the sad part of all this. How much of the collateral damage being caused is necessary? (That also goes for some of the “anti” blogs out there.)

Fortunately, the occasional barbs I’ve received from that direction haven’t been fatal and, in all honesty, while we both are local blogs I don’t consider him direct competition because I focus on the political side of news. Obviously we cover many of the same political events, but you won’t see me covering a car crash because I don’t find that sort of writing as interesting. Much of this whole blogging exercise amuses me because I like to be creative.

What I don’t like, though, is to have him depicted as a representative of all of us local writers. I link to about 40 local sites and almost to a person they don’t care much for you being seen as some sort of spokesperson for us. Maybe it’s time for people who really give a damn about the Eastern Shore to start looking at what they have to say.

As you see in the video above, this particular protagonist has little useful to add to the conversation.

Oh, just as an aside: why do you make political contributions from a Maryland address when you live in Delaware? I find that a bit shady.

Candidate Wednesday begins this week

The other day I told you folks that I was going to become another outlet for the Right Coast interviews being done by local questioner Matt Trenka. Tomorrow I will replay three of the nine videos done so far, somewhat randomly selected to present candidates in three different races. These will appear both here at monoblogue and in a slightly different format at my Wicomico County Examiner page.

There will also be my commentary on what was said, although I will limit it to a paragraph or two. I may also lend a hand to future interviews as my schedule allows, perhaps as an off-camera guest questioner.

So far the nine interviews which have been done include:

  • U.S. Senate candidate Jim Rutledge
  • House of Delegates candidates John Hayden, Mike McCready, Marty Pusey, Mike McDermott, and Dustin Mills
  • County Executive candidate John Wayne Baker
  • County Council candidates Chris Lewis and Mike Brewington

Of the group five are Republicans and four are Democrats so it is a nice bipartisan mix, although all are challengers.

At the moment doing three per week means I’ll have videos on August 11, 18, and 25. If there are more the date will be September 1 and as we approach the primary it may mean I add a day or two during that week since early voting begins September 3 and absentee ballots are out shortly.

Look for the first three videos tomorrow afternoon.

Channeling Billy Mays…

I couldn’t pass up making this prospective comment a post, particularly when the same pitch was made to me in an e-mail earlier in the week.

Hello,

I browsed your site and it’s a well made informative site. I have a good offer for you from http://www.ovlg.com/affiliate/.

We are a leading law firm in USA with attorneys in almost all the states. We are looking for people interested in debt consolidation / debt settlement and we have an excellent affiliate program for you.

The highlights of this program are:

1. FREE registration.
2. You put up a banner or text link or lead sign up form on your site and send traffic from your site to OVLG.
3. We will pay you $25 for each contactable lead.
4. We try to contact maximum 7 times over phone.
5. Detailed Control Panel to see the visitors, leads, revenue….

Join OVLG Affiliate Program Today and earn!! Our present affiliate partners are earning over $2000 per week.

For more questions please visit https://www.ovlg.com/affiliate/faqs.php or email me.

Thanks,

Brian Jones
Affiliate Executive

After I received the earlier e-mail I looked this up to see if it was legit, and Oak View Law Group is indeed a California-based law office which specializes in bankruptcy. But the most intriguing thing about it was that most of the personnel went by Americanized pseudonyms of foreign (my guess is Indian/Pakistani) names. Thus, I suspect this “Brian Jones” is not really who he says he is – obviously there are hundreds of people actually named Brian Jones out there. (One is a fellow YR from my Toledo days, so the name stuck out at me.)

What sticks in my craw about this, though, is the idea of profiting from other peoples’ misery. Obviously in this day and age there’s a need for this sort of law firm, although in my estimation they rank just barely above the worst ambulance chasers and mesothelioma hustlers which populate the commercial airwaves.

Do I sell advertising? Yes, I do. I even participate in an affiliate program where if you buy from Amazon through my site, I get a small commission. (Trust me, it’s small. But every so often I do get a few bucks in my PayPal account.) I have sold ad space to those people you see in my upper-right hand corner as well.

But my advertising is based on trying to help these people succeed, not take advantage of others’ failures. Obviously Marty Pusey and Julie Brewington will consider their political ad a success if they win their respective primaries, while another advertiser who’s not up yet will find out whether he’s successful on November 2nd. And should you buy your formal wear from Marty’s store? Absolutely! She’s a small business owner and I want her to prosper on that front regardless of whether she’s elected to be my Delegate or not (preferably the former.)

If others (who just may have gotten the same solicitation as I did) want to be OVLG’s affiliate, well, I can’t stop them. But I would rather be part of a win-win situation than a zero-sum (or worse) game.

In case you are interested in advertising on my site, you can go here. Let’s see if we can help each other prosper, even in these trying times.