Trying to bag the bag tax

I get the most interesting e-mail sometimes, and it helps to give me ideas for topics to write about in situations like this where my other commitments keep me from writing more lengthy, in-depth articles like the Harris townhall story now set for tomorrow.

About a week ago I received an e-mail from Claudia Holwill, who works for Edelman, a communications firm in Washington, D.C. I have a nodding familiarity with them because the good folks at API also apparently use them – most items from my friend Jane Van Ryan are also copied to a different Edelman employee. Holwill wrote me because, in part, her company must follow my website or at least is familiar with the group of sites covering Maryland politics:

I am writing because I saw your recent post about continuing efforts to raise taxes in Maryland, and wanted to reach out regarding the proposed legislation to tax plastic bags that you mentioned, and to see if you would be interested in meeting with an executive from Hilex in DC next week. 

Sadly, my previous commitments this week precluded me from that meeting, but it’s understandable that Hilex Poly, the company in question here, would be very interested in the prospect of a tax given that they are a plastic bag producer. And it’s no different than any of the several sources who pitch story ideas, meetings, conference calls, etc. to me given my position as a somewhat influential political blogger who can give them free pixels. And, of course, I don’t like tax increases any more than the next guy.

But there’s something else in the mix here as well. Think back to the days before you had the choice of “paper or plastic.”

Paper bags have a number of inherent weaknesses: they can tear easily, don’t stand up well to water or grease, and aren’t that convenient to carry. Obviously someone saw the opportunity to create a better bag and plastic bags are now the norm because they addressed these issues and more. Of course, they’re not environmentally correct because they’re not biodegradable like paper is, so the environmentalist wackos want to tax plastic bags and encourage the use of cloth bags. (But you have to carry them through the store to do your shopping. Wouldn’t that promote shoplifting?)

Bag makers play up their recycling angle. Another item Holwill sent me was this from Advance Polybag:

Advance Polybag, Inc., an Elkridge manufacturer of plastic bags, could see its jobs threatened if state lawmakers pass a five cent tax on grocery bags this legislative session. Passage of the bill would affect 140 people and their families.

Today, Rex Varn, Executive Vice President of Advance Polybag, released the following statement:

“We’re speaking out on this issue because we have an obligation to defend the 140 people who work at our plant in Elkridge and the numerous local businesses that support our operation. The bill the Maryland Legislature is considering will put these jobs at risk.

It will tax people at a time when the state is already struggling with 220,000 unemployed. No other state has implemented such a policy, and in fact, states that have tried, have rejected such proposals – instead opting to promote recycling efforts – a more effective solution to litter.

We are interested in having a productive dialogue to find more common sense solutions. Instead of a tax, we support promoting bag recycling – an approach that creates jobs and preserves consumer freedom and convenience. Many do not realize that plastic bags are safe, clean and 100 percent recyclable. They are made from natural gas, not oil; nine out of ten bags are re-used by consumers; and, when recycled, they create new materials.

We are committed to continuing our efforts to ensure that, as an industry, we provide the safest, most energy-efficient alternative at checkout.”

One thing Advance also pointed out is that the tax would create “a 500 percent levy on the good,” all for about $2 million in revenue over the next five years. They may call it the “Clean the Streams and Beautify the Bay Act of 2011” but it’s not about the Bay – it’s about the Benjamins.

Is it possible to have a useful product anymore without some do-gooder trying to get rid of it, tax it to death, or both? Let’s hope the plastic bag tax meets the same fate last year’s attempt does.


4 Responses to “Trying to bag the bag tax”

  1. John J. Walters on March 25th, 2011 10:24 am

    I am pretty against taxes, but I do have to admit that these plastic bags are a bit out of control. I definitely wouldn’t agree with the “9 out of 10 bags are reused” thing — I’ve watched many, many people just toss them away. Lots of them get tossed right outside the store. And the pamphlet that everyone in our apartment complex received when we started recycling specifically stated that plastic bags could not be taken. So there’s that.

    One way we could promote more reuse of the bags is to make them bigger and sturdier so they could be reused as kitchen trash can bags (instead of the tiny bags fit only for the bathroom or the pets’ business). Then maybe people wouldn’t mind paying for them, knowing they’re reducing one of their other expenses.

    Also, about the cloth bags: this may be breaking new ground in the US but it’s standard op in places like France. When I lived there I would go grocery shopping with my backpack and two other bags inside. I would fill these up as I shopped and then empty them onto the conveyor to pay at the end. Sometimes the cashier would check to make sure I didn’t conceal anything, but the whole process took about 4 seconds.

    Keep in mind that protecting jobs that currently exist is no more inherently “just” than promoting jobs that could exist. What makes these plastic bag workers more deserving of a job than the people who could potentially be manufacturing the cloth ones that would no doubt increase in popularity if we stopped handing out plastic bags for free?

  2. Michael on March 25th, 2011 12:39 pm

    So you are in favor of government picking winners and losers in this case?

    If I go to the grocery store in a regular week I may get 8 or 10 bags. Admittedly, I toss the majority out but I retain a few for places where they are useful (for example, Walmart bags are a good size to be a bag liner in a small wastepaper basket. Just don’t toss out anything wet.)

    But the extra 40 or 50 cents per trip comes out of my pocket, and since we buy groceries every week, this is going to collect yet another $20 or $25 a year from hard-working Maryland families like ours. And it all just gets dumped into the Chesapeake Bay Trust (less administrative costs, of course) – who knows when that fund will be raided to balance a future budget?

  3. MoCo first – Maryland next? : monoblogue on May 7th, 2011 11:26 am

    […] already discussed the state’s most recent effort to enact a bag tax, and of course those tax sponsors were thrilled to see Montgomery County take […]

  4. Odd and ends number 45 : monoblogue on February 28th, 2012 12:43 am

    […] a similar Radical Green note, I wrote awhile back about the prospect of a bag tax. Well, they are at it again, wishing to slap a nickel per bag fee on your grocery bill. One bag […]

  • I haven't. Have you?
  • 2018 Election

    Election Day is November 6 for all of us. However, Delaware still has to get through its primary on September 6.



    Larry Hogan (R – incumbent) – Facebook Twitter

    Shawn Quinn (Libertarian) – Facebook

    Ben Jealous (D) – Facebook Twitter

    Ian Schlakman (Green) Facebook Twitter


    U.S. Senate

    Tony Campbell (R) – Facebook Twitter

    Arvin Vohra (Libertarian) – Facebook Twitter

    Neal Simon (Unaffiliated) – Facebook Twitter

    Ben Cardin (D – incumbent) – Facebook Twitter


    U.S. Congress -1st District

    Andy Harris (R – incumbent) – Facebook Twitter

    Jenica Martin (Libertarian) – Facebook Twitter

    Jesse Colvin (D) – Facebook Twitter


    State Senate – District 37

    Addie Eckardt (R – incumbent) – Facebook

    Holly Wright (D) – Facebook


    Delegate – District 37A

    Frank Cooke (R) – Facebook

    Sheree Sample-Hughes (D – incumbent) – Twitter


    Delegate – District 37B (elect 2)

    Chris Adams (R – incumbent) – Facebook Twitter

    Johnny Mautz (R – incumbent) – Facebook Twitter

    Dan O’Hare (D) – Facebook


    State Senate – District 38

    Mary Beth Carozza (R) – Facebook Twitter

    Jim Mathias (D – incumbent) Facebook Twitter


    Delegate – District 38A

    Charles Otto (R – incumbent)

    Kirkland Hall, Sr. (D) – Facebook Twitter


    Delegate – District 38B

    Carl Anderton, Jr. (R – incumbent) Facebook Twitter


    Delegate – District 38C

    Wayne Hartman (R) – Facebook




    U.S. Senate



    Rob ArlettFacebook Twitter

    Roque de la FuenteFacebook Twitter

    Gene Truono, Jr. –  Facebook


    Libertarian (no primary, advances to General):

    Nadine Frost – Facebook



    Tom Carper (incumbent) – Facebook Twitter

    Kerri Evelyn HarrisFacebook Twitter


    Green (no primary, advances to General):

    Demitri Theodoropoulos



    Congress (at-large):



    Lee MurphyFacebook Twitter

    Scott Walker


    Democrat (no primary, advances to General):

    Lisa Blunt Rochester (D – incumbent) – Facebook Twitter

  • Categories

  • Archives

  • Link to Maryland Democratic Party

    In the interest of being fair and balanced, I provide this service to readers. But before you click on the picture below, just remember their message:

  • Part of the Politics in Stereo network.