Race relations the rule at NAACP forum

Wicomico County NAACP president Mary Ashanti called Wednesday night’s forum an opportunity to meet the candidates, and nearly 100 interested citizens saw all eight hopefuls for Salisbury city office meet at First Baptist Church to square off in the first of what promises to be several candidate forums leading to Salisbury’s primary election February 26. Each of the two City Council races will be pared from three hopefuls to two; however, the mayor’s race will not need a primary as just two candidates filed.

The two mayoral hopefuls opened the show, and it was clear from the outset that incumbent Jim Ireton and challenger Joe Albero certainly aren’t the best of friends. In his 90-second introduction, mayor Jim Ireton spoke about his accomplishments, being “excited about the last four years,” and “sharing a positive vision.” Yet three questions in he slammed Albero as one “who sees color,” insinuating that Albero is racist based in part by the content on his blog. That tone, along with a number of loaded audience questions presumably aimed at the challenger, brought an admonishment from Mary Ashanti midway through the mayoral portion of the forum that “we do not permit antagonism.” She would not use the “insulting” questions presented by some audience members.

Yet as the pair sparred over questions mainly dealing with the themes of crime, race relations, and jobs, the two laid out competing visions for the city. Moderator Orville Penn did a good job keeping them (and everyone else) relatively on track.

Ireton pointed out that crime was down, which he called an “amazing feat,” the Wicomico River was getting cleaner, the city enjoyed a $16 million surplus, and tenants had a bill of rights. Indeed, Type 1 crime is statistically lower, and as Jim noted, if the crime rate was up “my opponent would lay that at my feet.” Albero, as predicted, countered with his belief the crime numbers are “being fudged,” bringing a charge from Ireton that Albero was calling the Salisbury Police Department “liars.”

But in order to continue the downward trend, Jim called for a holistic approach to reduce recidivism. On the other hand, Albero thanked Council members Debbie Campbell and Terry Cohen for introducing the “Safe Streets” program to Salisbury but believed SPD morale is down and “we need to be behind them.”

Regarding race relations, Jim proclaimed we “must celebrate” the fact that Salisbury is now 44% minority, but would not commit to diversity in hiring, nor did Albero. Yet both wanted to be job creators.

One huge difference between the Albero and Ireton approaches, though, was the function of downtown Salisbury. Joe envisioned downtown Salisbury with a “Bourbon Street” feel, with entertainment and dining venues – he didn’t believe retail could survive downtown, even if he accomplished his goal of removing the parking meters. He also promised to be 50% mayor and 50% economic development director. Conversely, Ireton saw progress coming from incentives and planning – we need to make waterfront properties useful, and not parking lots, said Jim. “We need to have retail,” he added.

Another sharp difference came on a question about annexation. When Albero asked, “don’t you think we have enough on our hands?” he hastened to add that things are “out of control” in Salisbury and we need to rebuild our infrastructure. But Jim sharply reminded Joe the city can’t just annex land because they have to have the consent of property owners to do so.

In the end, though, it was Jim Ireton who said he was “more excited” about running this time than he was in 2009. “I believe in this city (and) I’m proud of the work we’ve done,” Ireton concluded.

For his part, Joe Albero also believed a brighter, better future for Salisbury is “doable.” “I will be a full-time mayor,” promised Joe.

Compared to the mayoral debate, the three-way tussles between District 1 and District 2 opponents were drama-free. In fact, the three District 1 contenders seemed to find a lot of common ground.

Incumbent Shanie Shields ran on her record of accomplishments in District 1, but was also critical of some missed opportunities over the last four years, in particular not developing the former Linens of the Week property or the old Station 16 firehouse. She also called the removal of the city attorney from the purview of the executive branch “a travesty for the city of Salisbury.”

Meanwhile, challenger (and 2009 candidate) Cynthia Polk focused on a platform of “living wage” jobs and youth development. Polk is the only non-incumbent with previous officeseeking experience; the rest are first-time candidates.

The other challenger, April Jackson, was more outspoken. She desired to “bring out the best in Salisbury,” but was critical of Council disagreements. “We’re sending some God-awful vibes,” she said, adding that they need to “resolve their anger issues.” She also panned the juvenile justice system for the leniency in sentencing she thought was contributing to Salisbury’s crime problem, but stressed as well the aspect of rehabilitation.

In the District 2 race, incumbent Debbie Campbell seemed to be a little defensive about having to say no all the time. Debbie’s opponents didn’t question her record, but during her remarks she stated the claim that 70 out of 80 ordinances and 190 of 200 resolutions had passed. The work can be hard to understand, Campbell added, but in her tenure she had prevented a tax increase, pushed the redevelopment of the River’s Edge project – a development she promised would be “amazing” – and saved Salisbury citizens $1 million.

Campbell, though, disagreed with portions of the Ireton plan for downtown, telling the audience subsidies and giving away parking lots are not solutions.

Downtowns are Jake Day’s specialty, and many of this challenger’s remarks came back to how Salisbury could improve its inner core. Jake was running, though, because he was “tired of old politics standing in the way of progress,” contending that the list of Council issues he disagreed with was “pretty long.” On the other hand, he got to see a number of other success stories through his work and wanted to bring that experience here.

The other challenger, Jack Heath, promoted his three-pronged vision for Salisbury: jobs, education, and recreation in a safe city, a vibrant, inviting downtown, and a city government which adopts the best ideas from its citizen. Having established that as his comfort zone, Heath stuck to those tenets throughout the conversation. It seemed to suit him, for as he noted in closing, “I’ve been known to be a negotiator.”

Of the two challengers, Day was the more aggressive and quicker on his feet. After Debbie Campbell had answered a previous question on diversity by pointing out local committees and commissions were a training ground for future policymakers, Jake closed by citing his work on various local boards and announcing, “I’m done training – I’m ready to fight.”

Obviously this forum focused a lot on issues affecting minority citizens, but in looking at what was said and the individual races I drew a couple conclusions.

In both Council races, one challenger seemed more at ease than the other. It was obvious that April Jackson is much more comfortable in this setting than Cynthia Polk, who probably campaigns best door-to-door. Similarly, Jake Day was more outspoken and aggressive in courting voters than Jack Heath; it follows that Day was the first to announce his intention and already has yard signs out. Heath has some catching up to do or he’ll be the odd man out.

It also seems to me that this mayoral race will be one of the dirtiest, slimiest campaigns in city history. Things will be said that, in ten years, may make the city a laughingstock – I just feel it in my bones. Hopefully both of these men will prove me wrong, but my reading of the two personalities tells me otherwise.

Comments

5 Responses to “Race relations the rule at NAACP forum”

  1. G. A. Harrison on February 1st, 2013 2:32 am

    Good piece Michael. Fair and balanced as usual. There are a few things that you should note.

    While Ireton did say that the city can’t just annex land because they have to have the consent of property owners to do so, Albero neither stated nor implied otherwise.

    You noted that Jake Day had a long list of disagreements with the current council. However, Day did list several specific instances. Day supported “The Bricks” which would have cost (state) taxpayers millions of dollars to build $250,000 apartments in one Salisbury’s most blighted neighborhoods. While Day talks a good game, you should also note that he accused Campbell of voting wrongly on the “critical areas ordinance”. The problem is that this bill has only just been scheduled for consideration at the next legislative session. Given Day’s position with the Eastern Shore Land Conservancy, he would have known this. You should also look into the real accomplishment vs. PR of the downtown projects Day has been claiming credit for. While there is definitely improvement in Cambridge’s downtown, it is hardly the model that Day would have you believe.

    As for Heath, I think he’s running for the wrong office and possibly in the wrong jurisdiction. Education is a county and state mandate – not Salisbury’s. Heath cites his managerial expertise, which is all but irrelevant to a councilman. I also note that Heath wants lots of spending on “quality of life” amenities but offers no means to pay for them.

    I found it almost laughable that BOTH Day and Heath want to EXPAND the city council to seven members. Does anyone other than Jake Day, Jack Heath, and Jim Ireton believe that is a SOLUTION rather than a SYMBOL.

    I haven’t agreed with every vote that Debbie Campbell has made during her eight years on council, but I do know that she is looking out for what’s best for the city and its residents. City residents are getting ready to pay for the Waste Water Treatment Plant for the second time. When Campbell asked questions about that plant during her early years on council she was ridiculed. IF people had listened then, Salisbury ratepayers would only have to pay for the WWTP once. The city’s debt would be even higher if not for her hard work and the city’s tax rate would be higher … with little to no positive result.

    As for Albero vs. Ireton, we saw Wednesday what this campaign will be about. Albero has already offered some solid solutions to make Salisbury a better place to work and live. I’m hopeful that he’ll get better over the next several weeks in communicating that vision and those solutions. Ireton will claim a great record, but can’t back it up. So … he’ll call Albero a racist or some other derogatory term hoping to divert attention away from voters and avoid them actually looking at his real record.

  2. Steve H on February 1st, 2013 4:31 pm

    GA Harrison – Since you are campaigning for Albero, I understand your view of the forum, however, please look at it from a standpoint of a voter who has yet to make a decision on who to vote for.

    Albero’s website is a public forum for a lot of thoughts and views that do not belong in the public discourse. Albero can state all he wants that it is not his viewpoint, but he (and you as one of the mods), by letting those comments in, creates the perception to many (wrongly) that they reflect his views. Many comments have no bearing on his posts, only to attack someone with subtle racist or homophobic undertones. Does it add to the discussion? No, but it does reflect poorly on the “community” that is SBYNEWS.

    Ireton’s message isn’t one that I want to hear – I want to know issues; but Albero shouldn’t act naive at the accusations. His blog is a voice for upset conservatives, but it is also a voice for people that are unable or unwilling to debate issues on facts and instead resort to name calling and the like.

    I do want to add that I believe Albero is making a huge mistake by not offering specifics on his blog. He has stated in the comments he will not give out details because Ireton will use them. Really? The two are so far apart on issues that it is laughable Albero should think that.

    My biggest concern is he has no plan outside of the downtown plaza. Sure, he says buzzwords like support SPD, cut the red tape for business, etc, etc. That’s not going to cut it for the voters he needs to attract. Myself and others see it as he’s a one-issue politician out to benefit himself by hoping to raise his property value on the Plaza.

  3. Julie on February 2nd, 2013 10:52 am

    Does the WCCC support Albero,. Mike?

  4. Michael on February 2nd, 2013 1:33 pm

    We haven’t met since the filing deadline, so the Central Committee has taken no stand. Certainly I’m aware that some members may support Joe, but if it comes up on the agenda I’m going to ask for neutrality.

    Unfortunately, we can’t have write-ins for any city elected post insofar as my reading of the City Charter, so we’re stuck with the candidates we have.

  5. A week of hearings and forums : monoblogue on February 16th, 2013 11:49 am

    [...] of Delaware and Booth Streets in Salisbury from 5-7 p.m. It’s the same location where the NAACP forum was held last month. One thing not made clear is whether mayoral candidates Joe Albero and Jim [...]

  • Political ad

    Mary Beth is running in District 38C.
    Mary Beth is running in District 38C.

    Authority: Friends of Mary Beth Carozza, Pat Schrawder, Treasurer.

  • Campaign 2014 – Maryland

    Primary election will be June 24, 2014.

    Governor:

    Republican

    David Craig
    Ron George
    Larry Hogan
    Charles Lollar

    Democrat

    Anthony Brown
    Doug Gansler
    Ralph Jaffe
    Heather Mizeur
    Charles Smith
    Cindy Walsh

    Comptroller:

    Republican

    William Campbell

    Democrat

    Peter Franchot

    Attorney General:

    Republican

    Jeffrey Pritzker

    Democrat

    Aisha Braveboy
    Jon Cardin
    Brian Frosh

  • Advertise with monoblogue and you’ll reach a lot of people!

    Freedom fighters and TEA partiers in Maryland and beyond are discovering monoblogue!

    Click on the photo for details.

  • I haven't. Have you?
  • Part of the Politics in Stereo network.
  • Link to Maryland Democratic Party

    In the interest of being fair and balanced, I provide this service to readers. But before you click on the picture below, just remember their message:

  • Categories

  • Locals flock to monoblogue

    More and more locals come here for 'News and views from Maryland's Eastern Shore.'

    Click on the photo for details on advertising opportunities.

  • Archives

  • More Campaign 2014

    First District - Congress

    Republican

    Jonathan Goff, Jr.
    Andy Harris (incumbent)

    Democrat

    John LaFerla
    Bill Tilghman

    Maryland General Assembly (local)

    Senate District 37

    Republican

    Richard Colburn (incumbent)
    Addie Eckardt

    Democrat

    Christopher Robinson

    ___

    House District 37A

    Republican

    (no candidates)

    Democrat

    Sheree Sample-Hughes

    ___

    House District 37B

    Republican

    Christopher Adams
    Rene Desmarais
    Johnny Mautz
    Allen Nelson
    Karen Tolley

    Democrat

    Rodney Benjamin
    Keasha Haythe

    ___

    Senate District 38

    Republican

    Mike McDermott

    Democrat

    Jim Mathias (incumbent)

    ___

    House District 38A

    Republican

    Charles Otto (incumbent)

    Democrat

    Percy Purnell, Jr.

    ___

    House District 38B

    Republican

    Carl Anderton, Jr.

    Democrat

    Norm Conway (incumbent)

    ___

    House District 38C

    Republican

    Mary Beth Carozza.

    Democrat

    Judy Davis
    Mike Hindi

    ___

    Wicomico County will be added after filing deadline,

  • Authority Line

      Notice:

    For items which pertain to my campaign Michael Swartz for Republican Central Committee

    Authority:
    Kimberley Corkran, Treasurer
    Michael Swartz, Candidate

    February 10, 2014