Just try making this stick, Harry!

In the department of, “who died and made you king?” comes this:

Americans for Limited Government President Bill Wilson today condemned Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid for inserting language into the Senate health care bill that would make it nearly impossible to repeal what Wilson called a “health care rationing board.”

“The Independent Medicare Advisory Board will become the Healthcare Soviet—dictating rules, rates and procedures in America’s health care system with no appeal.  That is why Reid has given it the most protection,” Wilson explained.

In the Reid Substitute, under Section 3403 in a section entitled “Limitations on Changes to this Subsection,” it states, “It shall not be in order in the Senate or the House of Representatives to consider any bill, resolution, amendment, or conference report that would repeal or otherwise change this subsection.”

Section 3403 establishes the Independent Medicare Advisory Board (IMAB), which would “reduce the per capita rate of growth in Medicare spending” under the Reid substitute.  Wilson said that is “rationing.”

“The whole purpose of this panel is to ration health care to seniors, no question,” Wilson said. 

“To hide that, the bill states that ‘The proposal shall not include any recommendation to ration health care’ right after it gets through establishing the power for the IMAB to ration health care,” Wilson explained.

“This is Orwellian Newspeak of the first order,” Wilson declared, adding, “Right in this section, Harry Reid is saying that they’re going to ration health care away from seniors, but they’re just not going to call it that.”

“And then, to lock it in place, Reid goes as far as to require a two-thirds vote in order to amend or repeal the rationing board,” Wilson explained.

The Senate rules change was exposed on the floor of the Senate by Senator Jim DeMint (R-SC), as reported by the National Review Online.  Senator DeMint said, “This is not legislation.  This is not law.  This is a rule change.  It’s a pretty big deal.  We will be passing a new law and at the same time creating a Senate rule that makes it out of order to amend or repeal the law.”

DeMint said that under Senate rules, it should take a two-thirds vote of the Senate to invoke cloture on legislation that contains such rules changes.  And, that, “[A]s the chair has confirmed, Rule 22, paragraph 2, of the standing rules of the Senate, states that on a measure or motion to amend the Senate rules, the necessary affirmative vote shall be two-thirds of the senators present and voting.”

However, the Senate President ruled that the rules change was not a rules change, but a change in procedure.

“This is completely unconstitutional,” Wilson noted, pointing to Article I, Section 5 of the Federal Constitution, which states: “Each House may determine the rules of its proceedings…”

“Under current rules, the Reid substitute, which includes a rules change making it out of order to amend or repeal a section of the bill, should require a two-thirds vote in order to be enacted,” Wilson explained, concluding, “That has not happened, and will not happen, meaning that once passed, any attempt to remove the health care rationing board will be deemed out of order forevermore.  People are going to die.”

How fast do you think something like this would be thrown into court if they tried to do this for, say, blocking abortions or gay marriage? Or to make a tax cut permanent? Now, of course, we can violate the rules like Senator Reid did when he allowed Senator Sanders to have the floor while his 700-page amendment was being read in order to pull it (by parliamentary procedure the floor still belonged to Senator Coburn) but the GOP doesn’t play that way. And forget the Democrats pointing this out in a helpful way.

It’s things like this which make Americans think the Senate isn’t a legislative body but a ruling class – didn’t we fight a war of secession to get away from a kingdom with a House of Lords? Then again, if we threw out everything which didn’t follow the rules of the road embodied in our Constitution there wouldn’t be a whole lot for the Senate to do.

I guess the solution will be to throw out Reid and his Democrat buddies in 2010, then enact new rules at the start of the next Senate to void Reid’s naked power grab. In a nation based on the rule of law, ideally there is nothing permanent except the Constitution, and the only thing out of order is idiocy on the scale Reid is helping to enact.

Author: Michael

It's me from my laptop computer.