<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ignorance, arrogance, or control? Or all three?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monoblogue.us/2009/10/20/ignorance-arrogance-or-control-or-all-three/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/10/20/ignorance-arrogance-or-control-or-all-three/</link>
	<description>I&#039;ve presented news and views from Maryland&#039;s Eastern Shore since 2005, but my writing can be found at several conservative websites.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: It&#8217;s time for accountability : monoblogue</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/10/20/ignorance-arrogance-or-control-or-all-three/comment-page-1/#comment-108990</link>
		<dc:creator>It&#8217;s time for accountability : monoblogue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 23:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=5611#comment-108990</guid>
		<description>[...] Speaking of goals, the pair also believed the hype about greenhouse gases and foolishly signed on to a job-killing measure to reduce greenhouse gases to 75% of 2006 levels by 2020. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll say that there is an &#8220;out&#8221; within the law if the economic price is too high (which there is) but why would someone agree to this pig in a poke in the first place? By that same token, these two stuck it to utilities through mandates regarding energy conservation. (This is why companies like Delmarva Power have to push their programmable thermostats.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Speaking of goals, the pair also believed the hype about greenhouse gases and foolishly signed on to a job-killing measure to reduce greenhouse gases to 75% of 2006 levels by 2020. I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;ll say that there is an &#8220;out&#8221; within the law if the economic price is too high (which there is) but why would someone agree to this pig in a poke in the first place? By that same token, these two stuck it to utilities through mandates regarding energy conservation. (This is why companies like Delmarva Power have to push their programmable thermostats.) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; So what will cap-and-trade cost?</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/10/20/ignorance-arrogance-or-control-or-all-three/comment-page-1/#comment-105283</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; So what will cap-and-trade cost?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=5611#comment-105283</guid>
		<description>[...] by the way, this is just the monetary cost. As I described yesterday, the cost in freedom from this measure can&#8217;t be as easily calculated but it will be a cost [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by the way, this is just the monetary cost. As I described yesterday, the cost in freedom from this measure can&#8217;t be as easily calculated but it will be a cost [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

