<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pictures from Salisbury&#8217;s Tea Party</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/</link>
	<description>I&#039;ve presented news and views from Maryland&#039;s Eastern Shore since 2005, but my writing can be found at several conservative websites.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 01:25:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Effigy optional</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-103042</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Effigy optional</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-103042</guid>
		<description>[...] fascinating study in political activism. In that span we&#8217;ve had two TEA parties (April 15th and July 4th), seen the formation of a local Americans for Prosperity chapter, and had the protest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fascinating study in political activism. In that span we&#8217;ve had two TEA parties (April 15th and July 4th), seen the formation of a local Americans for Prosperity chapter, and had the protest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Salisbury&#8217;s July 4th TEA Party in pictures and text</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-102366</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Salisbury&#8217;s July 4th TEA Party in pictures and text</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-102366</guid>
		<description>[...] weren&#8217;t as many people at the July 4th rendition of the TEA Party as there were on April 15th despite the fact that the weather was nicer. Obviously that was countered by the fact that many had [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] weren&#8217;t as many people at the July 4th rendition of the TEA Party as there were on April 15th despite the fact that the weather was nicer. Obviously that was countered by the fact that many had [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Frontier</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100353</link>
		<dc:creator>Final Frontier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 13:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100353</guid>
		<description>Baker,

If you believe that, you are very naive.  Andy Harris did not drive down here to listen in the rain, he drove down here for a campaign event.  He positioned himself to be seen and to speak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baker,</p>
<p>If you believe that, you are very naive.  Andy Harris did not drive down here to listen in the rain, he drove down here for a campaign event.  He positioned himself to be seen and to speak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of Maryland 57</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100340</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of Maryland 57</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 01:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100340</guid>
		<description>[...] arena, as my site&#8217;s bread and butter comes from talking politics. I scanned the scene at Salisbury&#8217;s Tax Day Tea Party last week in a pictorial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] arena, as my site&#8217;s bread and butter comes from talking politics. I scanned the scene at Salisbury&#8217;s Tax Day Tea Party last week in a pictorial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bakersdirtydozen</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100291</link>
		<dc:creator>bakersdirtydozen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:15:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100291</guid>
		<description>Whoa FF, Andy Harris wasn&#039;t even going to speak!  He was there to listen. The &quot;Ron Paul&quot; guy finally took pity on him and invited him to say a few words.  He even prefaced Andy speaking with his thoughts on how the TP is non-partisan and how those organizing this particular event show allegiance to no particular party, only the constitution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whoa FF, Andy Harris wasn&#8217;t even going to speak!  He was there to listen. The &#8220;Ron Paul&#8221; guy finally took pity on him and invited him to say a few words.  He even prefaced Andy speaking with his thoughts on how the TP is non-partisan and how those organizing this particular event show allegiance to no particular party, only the constitution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Frontier</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100257</link>
		<dc:creator>Final Frontier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 13:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100257</guid>
		<description>If you are for personal freedom, you are against Outraged Richard, so look out!  Honestly, Michael, I think you really are a Libertarian more than a Republican. The guys who are all fired up and threatening the Republican Party on this make a good liberal Democrat like myself smile.  They are behaving like Democrats, eating their own.  You might not agree with everything party leadership does, but until you have actually been in the trenches and worked hard for your party (including actually getting involved in local politics), it is easier to tilt at windills than it is to get in and do the hard work of political change.  Are they willing to make the personal sacrifices that this would necessitate?  We&#039;ll see.  Most of them have not bothered to attend a city council meeting, so I don&#039;t have a lot of hope for that.   
My point about the partisanship is that this is allegedly a non-partisan group, yet if you want to go after a massive pork barreler, you should have a sign against Sarah Palin rather than the guy who just cut taxes for pretty much everyone at that rally.  Have you seen the video of the guy who pointed this out at one of the rallies?  It was pretty funny (it is over on TwoSentz).  Andy Harris should not have spoken here (if he wanted to participate as a regular citizen he could have spoken at a local one--he was making this a campaign event), and to make matters worse, I understand he did not wait in line to speak as everyone else did.  Not a good move at this type of event.
Finally, hats off to the organizers and to all of the people who stood out in the rain on Wednesday!  I do not agree with your politics, but it was awesome to see people get involved.  I sincerely do hope you take some of that energy and see if you can apply it to improving our city.  Protesting is important and valuable, but then working contructively to help our community is the next step.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are for personal freedom, you are against Outraged Richard, so look out!  Honestly, Michael, I think you really are a Libertarian more than a Republican. The guys who are all fired up and threatening the Republican Party on this make a good liberal Democrat like myself smile.  They are behaving like Democrats, eating their own.  You might not agree with everything party leadership does, but until you have actually been in the trenches and worked hard for your party (including actually getting involved in local politics), it is easier to tilt at windills than it is to get in and do the hard work of political change.  Are they willing to make the personal sacrifices that this would necessitate?  We&#8217;ll see.  Most of them have not bothered to attend a city council meeting, so I don&#8217;t have a lot of hope for that.<br />
My point about the partisanship is that this is allegedly a non-partisan group, yet if you want to go after a massive pork barreler, you should have a sign against Sarah Palin rather than the guy who just cut taxes for pretty much everyone at that rally.  Have you seen the video of the guy who pointed this out at one of the rallies?  It was pretty funny (it is over on TwoSentz).  Andy Harris should not have spoken here (if he wanted to participate as a regular citizen he could have spoken at a local one&#8211;he was making this a campaign event), and to make matters worse, I understand he did not wait in line to speak as everyone else did.  Not a good move at this type of event.<br />
Finally, hats off to the organizers and to all of the people who stood out in the rain on Wednesday!  I do not agree with your politics, but it was awesome to see people get involved.  I sincerely do hope you take some of that energy and see if you can apply it to improving our city.  Protesting is important and valuable, but then working contructively to help our community is the next step.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tulsa Pulper</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100219</link>
		<dc:creator>Tulsa Pulper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 18:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100219</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t this horde show up at City and County budget and regular meetings when the pork is being passed out to put a stop to such things as paying $10,000 per acre for farmland that is not worth half that much?

And why no protest about wasting taxpayers&#039; money to beautify the obsolete &quot;standpipe&quot; in Salisbury?

Don&#039;t just talk the talk if you won&#039;t walk the walk!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t this horde show up at City and County budget and regular meetings when the pork is being passed out to put a stop to such things as paying $10,000 per acre for farmland that is not worth half that much?</p>
<p>And why no protest about wasting taxpayers&#8217; money to beautify the obsolete &#8220;standpipe&#8221; in Salisbury?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t just talk the talk if you won&#8217;t walk the walk!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100214</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 14:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100214</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;OR&lt;/em&gt;: You expected otherwise from the mainstream media? But it also answers the talking points that the left put up when they called into some of the radio shows I was listening to yesterday (I had an enrollment in Wilmington, which was why I arrived a little late.)

In essence, we&#039;re not saying that we necessarily object to paying taxes. But when the people were against the bailouts and excessive spending Congress didn&#039;t listen (well, most of the Republicans did but they&#039;re not a majority currently.) That was more the thrust of our protests, which actually evolved in the tenor of what was said into a commentary on the overreaching federal and state governments - not just into our wallets but onto our properties, into our schools, and those things we own and hold dear.

&lt;em&gt;FF&lt;/em&gt;: I hate to tell you this, but bad economics is generally blamed on the guy at the top. It seems like you on the left bashed Bush for a bad economy in the last couple years, so turnabout is fair play.

If the speeches were &quot;definitely partisan&quot; does that not force a reexamination of whether your side&#039;s core beliefs include the concepts of limited government, low taxation, personal freedom (not just to abort babies but own firearms, purchase the type of cars one wishes even if it&#039;s a gas-guzzler, build on your property, etc.), and being accountable for one&#039;s actions?

&lt;em&gt;7of9&lt;/em&gt;: In many respects I agreed with Ron Paul&#039;s platform with the exception of the more interventionist foreign policy I favor. It&#039;s not that I would have preferred war in the Middle East but nothing else seemed to be a deterrent to radical Islam. Would you rather we have done nothing to the pirates who hijacked the &lt;em&gt;Maersk Alabama&lt;/em&gt; and held the ship&#039;s captain hostage?

I&#039;m a firm believer in the Reagan doctrine of &quot;peace through strength.&quot; Where we are weakest now though is economically and the rally yesterday was an effort to address this.

Aside from that I&#039;m right there with you on state&#039;s rights and personal freedom (for example, I thought the PATRIOT Act should have maintained its sunset date. President Lincoln suspended &lt;em&gt;habeas corpus&lt;/em&gt; for a time but it was restored after hostilities ended.)

I don&#039;t want to say the GOP should take your vote for granted but aside from the Libertarians (who rarely score more than low single-digits in a state or national election) there&#039;s no real political home for those beliefs.

On a personal note, I&#039;d like to thank those who did put the event together. For not really organized it was quite well-run - just wish the weather had been better but as it was pointed out George Washington&#039;s freedom fighters braved cold and snow without shoes or sufficient clothing, so our suffering was miniscule comparatively.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>OR</em>: You expected otherwise from the mainstream media? But it also answers the talking points that the left put up when they called into some of the radio shows I was listening to yesterday (I had an enrollment in Wilmington, which was why I arrived a little late.)</p>
<p>In essence, we&#8217;re not saying that we necessarily object to paying taxes. But when the people were against the bailouts and excessive spending Congress didn&#8217;t listen (well, most of the Republicans did but they&#8217;re not a majority currently.) That was more the thrust of our protests, which actually evolved in the tenor of what was said into a commentary on the overreaching federal and state governments &#8211; not just into our wallets but onto our properties, into our schools, and those things we own and hold dear.</p>
<p><em>FF</em>: I hate to tell you this, but bad economics is generally blamed on the guy at the top. It seems like you on the left bashed Bush for a bad economy in the last couple years, so turnabout is fair play.</p>
<p>If the speeches were &#8220;definitely partisan&#8221; does that not force a reexamination of whether your side&#8217;s core beliefs include the concepts of limited government, low taxation, personal freedom (not just to abort babies but own firearms, purchase the type of cars one wishes even if it&#8217;s a gas-guzzler, build on your property, etc.), and being accountable for one&#8217;s actions?</p>
<p><em>7of9</em>: In many respects I agreed with Ron Paul&#8217;s platform with the exception of the more interventionist foreign policy I favor. It&#8217;s not that I would have preferred war in the Middle East but nothing else seemed to be a deterrent to radical Islam. Would you rather we have done nothing to the pirates who hijacked the <em>Maersk Alabama</em> and held the ship&#8217;s captain hostage?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a firm believer in the Reagan doctrine of &#8220;peace through strength.&#8221; Where we are weakest now though is economically and the rally yesterday was an effort to address this.</p>
<p>Aside from that I&#8217;m right there with you on state&#8217;s rights and personal freedom (for example, I thought the PATRIOT Act should have maintained its sunset date. President Lincoln suspended <em>habeas corpus</em> for a time but it was restored after hostilities ended.)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t want to say the GOP should take your vote for granted but aside from the Libertarians (who rarely score more than low single-digits in a state or national election) there&#8217;s no real political home for those beliefs.</p>
<p>On a personal note, I&#8217;d like to thank those who did put the event together. For not really organized it was quite well-run &#8211; just wish the weather had been better but as it was pointed out George Washington&#8217;s freedom fighters braved cold and snow without shoes or sufficient clothing, so our suffering was miniscule comparatively.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 7of9</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100212</link>
		<dc:creator>7of9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100212</guid>
		<description>Michael,

I want to thank you for speaking.  The Salisbury Tea party was &quot;organized&quot; if you want to call it that by 7 or 9 core people that used their friends, families and contacts to locally get the word out entirely for free using the internet and several local radio personalities.  Did we allow the national &quot;Tea Party&quot; movement to popularize this idea, yes.  Do we agree with how a few neocons have grabbed onto this popular sentiment. Of course not.  

Speaking as one of the 7 of 9 guys that was there, and a Ron Paul republican, I am asking you to please put the Wicomico County / Salisbury neo-Republicans on notice.  We are bypassing you.  You have failed us by not speaking out loud enough against the Republican neo-con movement that got us to where we are today.    By doing so you have enabled this same movement to continue to run the Republican Party.  That party has given us, torture as a good idea, out of control budget growth, which is being accelerated logarithmically by the current pretender to the Presidency, a foreign policy of personal retribution that continues to bankrupt us, albeit currently in a slightly different geographic location, and an overall abandonment of Constitutional Principles such as states right, habeas Corpus, and sound money.  

These people have abandoned OUR core beliefs, they have abandoned Constitutional mandates, and they are on their way out.  Do I want to thank Andy Harris and Debbie Campbell for being there?  Yes, of course.  But may I humbly ask them if I might send a gentle caution flag their way.  

OUR votes are no longer for free.  Continue to disenfranchise us and you, like many Republicans, will be sent back home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>I want to thank you for speaking.  The Salisbury Tea party was &#8220;organized&#8221; if you want to call it that by 7 or 9 core people that used their friends, families and contacts to locally get the word out entirely for free using the internet and several local radio personalities.  Did we allow the national &#8220;Tea Party&#8221; movement to popularize this idea, yes.  Do we agree with how a few neocons have grabbed onto this popular sentiment. Of course not.  </p>
<p>Speaking as one of the 7 of 9 guys that was there, and a Ron Paul republican, I am asking you to please put the Wicomico County / Salisbury neo-Republicans on notice.  We are bypassing you.  You have failed us by not speaking out loud enough against the Republican neo-con movement that got us to where we are today.    By doing so you have enabled this same movement to continue to run the Republican Party.  That party has given us, torture as a good idea, out of control budget growth, which is being accelerated logarithmically by the current pretender to the Presidency, a foreign policy of personal retribution that continues to bankrupt us, albeit currently in a slightly different geographic location, and an overall abandonment of Constitutional Principles such as states right, habeas Corpus, and sound money.  </p>
<p>These people have abandoned OUR core beliefs, they have abandoned Constitutional mandates, and they are on their way out.  Do I want to thank Andy Harris and Debbie Campbell for being there?  Yes, of course.  But may I humbly ask them if I might send a gentle caution flag their way.  </p>
<p>OUR votes are no longer for free.  Continue to disenfranchise us and you, like many Republicans, will be sent back home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Final Frontier</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100211</link>
		<dc:creator>Final Frontier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:21:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100211</guid>
		<description>How exactly was this non-partisan?  You&#039;ve got an elected Republican official, you&#039;ve got a pile of signs going after Obama (any going after Sarah Palin, whose state is in the top 3 receivers of pork barrel projects this year?), and many of the speeches that I heard were definitely partisan!  Why don&#039;t you all call this what it  is: a movement to try to get conservative Republicans elected during the next cycle?  There&#039;s nothing wrong with that, so why pretend that it is something else?  I don&#039;t get it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How exactly was this non-partisan?  You&#8217;ve got an elected Republican official, you&#8217;ve got a pile of signs going after Obama (any going after Sarah Palin, whose state is in the top 3 receivers of pork barrel projects this year?), and many of the speeches that I heard were definitely partisan!  Why don&#8217;t you all call this what it  is: a movement to try to get conservative Republicans elected during the next cycle?  There&#8217;s nothing wrong with that, so why pretend that it is something else?  I don&#8217;t get it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Outraged Richard</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100195</link>
		<dc:creator>Outraged Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 06:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100195</guid>
		<description>Michael, I am getting the distinct impression from liberal media articles that the Tax Day Tea Party protest was based on an &quot;anti-tax&quot; platform when that was not the case. 

http://taxdayteaparty.com/about/

The protest was more about concerned citizens being outraged about the &quot;bankrupt liberal agenda of the White House Administration and Congress. Specifically, the flawed “Stimulus Bill” and pork filled budget [and] out of control government spending&quot; than people who want to cease paying their taxes.

Already the liberal media is twisting the common sense frugal values voiced by millions across the country into Ruby Ridge type people who refuse to pay any government taxes, thereby taking the spotlight off of the first black president who is new on the job and Congress who is just doing the best they can to help him.

What gives, Michael?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael, I am getting the distinct impression from liberal media articles that the Tax Day Tea Party protest was based on an &#8220;anti-tax&#8221; platform when that was not the case. </p>
<p><a href="http://taxdayteaparty.com/about/" rel="nofollow">http://taxdayteaparty.com/about/</a></p>
<p>The protest was more about concerned citizens being outraged about the &#8220;bankrupt liberal agenda of the White House Administration and Congress. Specifically, the flawed “Stimulus Bill” and pork filled budget [and] out of control government spending&#8221; than people who want to cease paying their taxes.</p>
<p>Already the liberal media is twisting the common sense frugal values voiced by millions across the country into Ruby Ridge type people who refuse to pay any government taxes, thereby taking the spotlight off of the first black president who is new on the job and Congress who is just doing the best they can to help him.</p>
<p>What gives, Michael?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Delaware&#8217;s Tax Day Tea Parties Reflections &#171; That&#8217;s Elbert With An E</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2009/04/15/pictures-from-salisburys-tea-party/comment-page-1/#comment-100193</link>
		<dc:creator>Delaware&#8217;s Tax Day Tea Parties Reflections &#171; That&#8217;s Elbert With An E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 04:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=3991#comment-100193</guid>
		<description>[...] A contributer to this site, Michael at Monoblogue posted some pictures and comments from the Salisbury, MD Tea Party. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A contributer to this site, Michael at Monoblogue posted some pictures and comments from the Salisbury, MD Tea Party. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

