<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Legislative checkup, February 2008 (part 1)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/</link>
	<description>News and views from Maryland&#039;s Eastern Shore since 2005, and home site of the Liberty Features syndicated columnist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Legislative checkup, 2008 session day 60 (part 1)</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-78771</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Legislative checkup, 2008 session day 60 (part 1)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 20:13:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=841#comment-78771</guid>
		<description>[...] I believe day 60 actually falls on Sunday but I thought this a good time to see how the bills I highlighted last month have progressed. Just like in February, today I&#8217;ll look at the Democrats&#8217; bills and tomorrow legislation proposed by the Maryland GOP. If you want a brief synopsis of each piece of legislation, that can be found on the original post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I believe day 60 actually falls on Sunday but I thought this a good time to see how the bills I highlighted last month have progressed. Just like in February, today I&#8217;ll look at the Democrats&#8217; bills and tomorrow legislation proposed by the Maryland GOP. If you want a brief synopsis of each piece of legislation, that can be found on the original post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Welcome to Economics 101</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-78630</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Welcome to Economics 101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 02:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=841#comment-78630</guid>
		<description>[...] Now I&#8217;ll turn my attention to HB512/SB302, which is one bill I brought up in my Legislative Checkup a few weeks back because it&#8217;s a bill co-sponsored by local Delegate Rudy Cane. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now I&#8217;ll turn my attention to HB512/SB302, which is one bill I brought up in my Legislative Checkup a few weeks back because it&#8217;s a bill co-sponsored by local Delegate Rudy Cane. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of Maryland 27</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-77711</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Carnival of Maryland 27</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=841#comment-77711</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m also chipping in as I usually do with two posts of an Annapolis nature, but two that are related. Frequent readers here know I pay pretty close attention to the goings-on in our General Assembly and last weekend I wrote a pair of posts I call the Legislative Checkup. Part one dealt mainly with bills sponsored by Democrats and part two those backed by the GOP. I use what bills my local legislators here on the Lower Shore sponsored as a point of reference but these measures will affect us all here in the Free State. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m also chipping in as I usually do with two posts of an Annapolis nature, but two that are related. Frequent readers here know I pay pretty close attention to the goings-on in our General Assembly and last weekend I wrote a pair of posts I call the Legislative Checkup. Part one dealt mainly with bills sponsored by Democrats and part two those backed by the GOP. I use what bills my local legislators here on the Lower Shore sponsored as a point of reference but these measures will affect us all here in the Free State. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Legislative checkup, February 2008 (part 2)</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-76872</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Legislative checkup, February 2008 (part 2)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 21:20:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=841#comment-76872</guid>
		<description>[...] Today it&#8217;s the turn of the loyal opposition Republicans to have the magnifying glass placed on some of their legislative agenda. While there were a couple measures that were mostly-GOP sponsored among those highlighted in Part 1 yesterday, today these are strictly GOP issues - at least among the local delegation. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Today it&#8217;s the turn of the loyal opposition Republicans to have the magnifying glass placed on some of their legislative agenda. While there were a couple measures that were mostly-GOP sponsored among those highlighted in Part 1 yesterday, today these are strictly GOP issues &#8211; at least among the local delegation. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-76856</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:28:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=841#comment-76856</guid>
		<description>Nope, sorry. You&#039;re stuck with me. However, Toledo is always looking for people who aren&#039;t too smart and simply vote for the Democrat machine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nope, sorry. You&#8217;re stuck with me. However, Toledo is always looking for people who aren&#8217;t too smart and simply vote for the Democrat machine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fred</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2008/02/16/legislative-checkup-february-2008-part-1/comment-page-1/#comment-76851</link>
		<dc:creator>fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 12:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=841#comment-76851</guid>
		<description>Michael:

With AES going out of business and the other firms tanking, any chance you&#039;ll be laid off soon so you can return to Ohio?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael:</p>
<p>With AES going out of business and the other firms tanking, any chance you&#8217;ll be laid off soon so you can return to Ohio?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
