<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: monoblogue&#8217;s Constitutional convention</title>
	<atom:link href="http://monoblogue.us/2007/07/02/monoblogues-constitutional-convention/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://monoblogue.us/2007/07/02/monoblogues-constitutional-convention/</link>
	<description>News and views from Maryland&#039;s Eastern Shore since 2005, and home site of the Liberty Features syndicated columnist.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 16:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All guns blazing</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2007/07/02/monoblogues-constitutional-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-94132</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; All guns blazing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=537#comment-94132</guid>
		<description>[...] three could be the seed for a new Constitutional Amendment. It may go with some others I&#8217;ve proposed. Because I&#8217;m writing this off the cuff as it were, I&#8217;m not going to spend the time to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] three could be the seed for a new Constitutional Amendment. It may go with some others I&#8217;ve proposed. Because I&#8217;m writing this off the cuff as it were, I&#8217;m not going to spend the time to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who will I support? - part one</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2007/07/02/monoblogues-constitutional-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-38870</link>
		<dc:creator>monoblogue &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Who will I support? - part one</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jul 2007 03:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=537#comment-38870</guid>
		<description>[...] Most people have some pet issue that they base their support on. I&#8217;m definitely not a one-issue person in that my support isn&#8217;t based on a candidate being simply pro-life, pro-gun, anti-judicial activism, or wherever their passion lies. As frequent readers know, my issue base is much more broad and, while it&#8217;s generally considered conservative, I don&#8217;t subscribe to the portion of conservatism that advocates Constitutional amendments regarding flag burning, abortion, etc. Much as the recent immigration fight had its opponents (including myself) that advocated simply tightening enforcement of existing laws, by and large I&#8217;d like to see Congress and the federal government as a whole follow the Constitution they already have, with a few additions that I spoke about previously. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Most people have some pet issue that they base their support on. I&#8217;m definitely not a one-issue person in that my support isn&#8217;t based on a candidate being simply pro-life, pro-gun, anti-judicial activism, or wherever their passion lies. As frequent readers know, my issue base is much more broad and, while it&#8217;s generally considered conservative, I don&#8217;t subscribe to the portion of conservatism that advocates Constitutional amendments regarding flag burning, abortion, etc. Much as the recent immigration fight had its opponents (including myself) that advocated simply tightening enforcement of existing laws, by and large I&#8217;d like to see Congress and the federal government as a whole follow the Constitution they already have, with a few additions that I spoke about previously. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: teeman</title>
		<link>http://monoblogue.us/2007/07/02/monoblogues-constitutional-convention/comment-page-1/#comment-36412</link>
		<dc:creator>teeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jul 2007 03:29:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://monoblogue.us/?p=537#comment-36412</guid>
		<description>it is always nice to see thoughtful amendments, however, reality sets in and money begets power and vice versa... term limits are never to be enacted, states could instill them on the elected but don&#039;t... congress is bad, but my congressman is great...

if the constitutional remedy for deficits spending were continued, where states had to fork over the overage according to their population, accountability in our elected officials would have term limits... ousted by elections.

teeman</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is always nice to see thoughtful amendments, however, reality sets in and money begets power and vice versa&#8230; term limits are never to be enacted, states could instill them on the elected but don&#8217;t&#8230; congress is bad, but my congressman is great&#8230;</p>
<p>if the constitutional remedy for deficits spending were continued, where states had to fork over the overage according to their population, accountability in our elected officials would have term limits&#8230; ousted by elections.</p>
<p>teeman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
